Процессор: Core i7;Видеокарта: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Обзор:Обзор ноутбука ASUS TUF Gaming FX705: доступный игровой ноутбук ROG?
Unless otherwise stated, all 4.5 claims are based on theoretical performance. Actual figures may vary in real-world situations.Артефакты из-за транзисторов. Редкий случай и дорогой ремонт ноутбука ASUS ROG G501JW
The actual 4.5 speed of USB 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 Type-C will 4.5 depending on many factors including the processing speed of the host device, file attributes and other factors related to system configuration and your operating environment.
4.5 /> Apr 23, 2015 · Обзор игрового ноутбука Asus ROG G750JZ — мощно!
- Duration: 5:13. F.ua — О девайсах понятным языком 186,896 views
Aug 17, 2015 · С новым ультратонким ноутбуком 4.5 ROG G501JW 4.5 не нужны компромиссы – просто возьмите всё!
Asus 4.5 Notebook Review. Allen Ngo.
we would not have been able to guess that this was a ROG model. Asus throws away the old signature matte and jet black 4.5 scheme for smooth brushed.
asus rog g501jw 15.6″ 4k 3860 x 2160 3.6ghz 16gb ram 512gb ssd geforce® gtx960m £ 1,599.00 – £ 1,699.00
Recently, we reviewed Asus' new 4.5 of the ROG series, the high-end US model.
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Asus G501JW (FHD) Notebook Review. 4.5
ASUS ROG G501JW-BHI7N12 - 15.6" - Core i7 4750HQ - 8 GB RAM Приёмник цифровой PBI 1 TB HDD overview and full product specs on CNET.
Testseek has 4.5 42 expert reviews for ASUS ROG G501JW-BHI7N12 notebook Black 39.6 cm (15.6") 1920 x 1080 pixels 4th gen Intel® Core™ i7 i7-4750HQ 8 GB DDR3L-SDRAM 1000 GB HDD and the average expert rating is 78 of 100.
The average score reflects the expert community’s 4.5 on this product.
Ausführlicher Test des Asus G501JW (Intel Core i7 4720HQ, Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M, 15.6", 2.1 kg) mit zahlreichen Messungen, Benchmarks und Bewertungen
PIM product data: ASUS ROG G501JW-CN030H Portàtil Negre Ordinador portàtil 39,6 cm (15.6") 1920 x 1080 Pixeles 4th gen Intel® Core™ i7 16 GB DDR3L-SDRAM 1128 GB HDD+SSD Windows 8.1 G501JW-CN030H Portàtils, compare, review, comparison, specifications, price, brochure, catalog, product information, content syndication, product info, product data, datasheet Recently, we reviewed Asus' new member of the ROG series, the high-end US model.
Nevertheless, it even performs partly better than the more expensive model we reviewed.
For the original German review, see.
We mainly focus on the necessary compromises and which of these are acceptable for everyday gaming and multimedia use.
Obviously, cuts had not been made with performance-relevant components, namely processor and graphics card.
There is still an Intel Core quad-core processor and an in our test model.
RAM is only 8 GB, but it still works in dual-channel mode.
The storage devices became smaller and bigger.
The capacity 4.5 the fast storage decreased from 512 GB to 128 GB.
However, an additional 1 TB HDD was incorporated.
Those who still hope for a UHD display will be disappointed.
Nevertheless, our Asus G501JW features a decent Full HD display.
Please refer to the for aspects which remained the same case, keyboard, читать />We will cover what has changed here.
In addition, we will compare our test model to other notebooks of its category.
Working For Notebookcheck Are you a techie who knows how to write?
Then join our Team!
Currently wanted: News and Editorial Editor - - 4096 MB, Core: 1100 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, nvlddmkm 9.
The manufacturer incorporated a matte Full HD display with a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels.
While the resolution is lower, manufacturer and IPS technology remained the same.
Due to a matte surface, gloss reflections are not disturbing.
The contrast is significantly better, too and it is now an excellent 1110:1.
The black value is lower and black even deeper.
The brightness distribution improved, too.
It is 95% now, which is 18% higher than the predecessor's.
Overall, the cheaper display with lower resolution performs better in all aspects and saves money.
The similarly priced competition hardly performs better.
The recently reviewed performs worse than our test model, too.
DeltaE shifts of colors and gray levels of close to 6 are rather modest for an IPS display.
After calibration these fall to good 4.
A glance at the more expensive reveals that it does not 4.5 better.
The is commendable in this regard in this notebook category with a DeltaE shift of only 2.
The high color coverage of the thin all-rounder is surprising.
Our test model completely covers the sRGB space and 71% of AdobeRGB.
These are the highest values among similar notebooks.
However, these values are only relevant for professional graphics editors.
With its slim design, the 15.
The bright and matte display по этому сообщению that outdoor use is possible for the most part.
Only direct sunlight should be avoided.
The maximum brightness is also available on battery.
Finally, we want to cover the https://greenl66.ru/asus/bide-podvesnoe-gsi-traccia-6921111.html angles.
Thanks to the IPS panel, colors and brightness do not change.
The only flaw is the small opening angle caused by the design.
It should be slightly bigger for use on the lap or other positions.
The combination from high-performance processor and powerful dedicated graphics card Пылесос Eurostek multimedia and gaming.
Our test model can also cope with demanding applications.
Asus also incorporated an in the cheaper model.
This нажмите чтобы увидеть больше clocks at 2.
Our test model achieved a significantly продолжение здесь result than the already reviewed in Cinebench R15.
During Cinebench the Интересную Матрица для ноутбука Asus G750GX (AS_LCD_N173HGE-L21) нашем clock is about 300-500 MHz higher than the base clock.
After multiple runs, the clock rate falls since the case temperature increases.
In the other Cinebench results, our gaming device is on par with its more expensive again.
According to Cinebench R11.
The test model only reaches just above one-third of the points in the multi-core test.
We liked the combination from fast processor, powerful GPU and useful HDD-SSD combination.
The performance was not only subjectively convincing.
With about 5800 points, PCMark 7 confirms our subjective impression.
The Asus model with 16 GB of RAM and PCI-e SSD even achieved about 400 points more.
Nevertheless, the achieved rating is on a very high level.
We already said extremely positive things about the previously tested.
Unfortunately, our test model does not perform that well by far.
The storage capacities are different, too.
However, it has an additional 1 TB HDD.
Even though you could say that the result is good according to the benchmarks, you should note that a 128 GB SSD hardly has space for current games.
These have to be installed on the HDD in any case.
So, there is no performance advantage when loading game data.
This also affects games when huge amounts of data textures are loaded.
Alike the CPU, the graphics unit remained the same.
It is a new of the Maxwell series.
In our test model it comes with the biggest possible video RAM of 4 GB.
This dedicated graphics card 4.5 and is 4.5 10% faster in our benchmarks.
In the 3DMark 11 benchmark, our test model reaches a slightly higher rating than its more expensive sibling with almost 5300 points.
However, this is due to the variance of these tests.
We had to update all drives because the benchmarks ends with a blue screen otherwise.
In addition, full performance is only available in mains operation.
The 3DMark 11 rating is only 1756 points on battery.
In order to compare our test model to the test model with more powerful components, we chose a previously tested game: Metro: Last Light, published in 2014, is a good representative for the used graphics card.
Unfortunately, the display frequently turned black during the test.
We do not know why and a driver update did not change things.
We do not know whether this has an impact on performance.
At least the test ran constantly to the end.
Compared to other devices with GTX 960M graphics chip, both Asus G501 models perform significantly worse.
For example the achieves a relevant 7 fps more at maximum settings.
These ensure that the game runs smoother than on our test model.
The G501 is about 20 to 25% worse than what is expected for comparable components.
Further tests of current games with the GTX 960M по ссылке available.
Unfortunately, the fans of our test model are quite erratic and so, always audible.
While idle, the noise level is between 31 and 34 dB A.
The fans were never completely off when the notebook was in Магнитный пускатель/контактор перемен.
тока (ac) ABB GJL1313061R6102 />Under load, the maximum noise is about 44 dB A.
It is advantageous that both fans decrease their speed again once they did their work.
Subjectively, the generated frequency range is high, but it is not too disturbing.
To summarize, our test model performs, for example better, than thewhich is overall louder.
One of the biggest problems of slim gaming notebooks is dissipation of waste heat.
The manufacturer solves this challenge skillfully in our test model.
адрес idle the notebook remains comfortably cool.
It first reaches the maximum temperature of 47.
Similarly equipped notebooks like the 4.5 significantly warmer on average.
The is an extreme example with maximum temperatures of almost 62 °C.
With our stress test we want to analyze ссылка на страницу the clock rates behave inside the notebook.
We use Prime95 and FurMark for this.
The CPU clock already falls below its base clock to 2.
After only 3 minutes, the clock rate is between 1.
A few minutes later, the clock rate hovers around 2.
A bigger problem came up in further course.
The display turned inadvertently black, which could only be fixed by rebooting the laptop.
Our tries to solve this problem remained unsuccessful.
Therefore, we do not have a screenshot of the stress test.
We suspect a technical problem of our test model.
± The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.
Our all-rounder already requires much energy while idle with 13.
In comparison, the needs between 8.
This might be caused by the switch between integrated and dedicated graphics card.
We cannot precisely explain these surprising values.
During load, the power consumption is quite constant at 81.
This value is very low for the used hardware and is caused by throttling under extreme load.
Notebooks with similar components usually exceed 120 Watt.
Unfortunately, powerful hardware usually has a negative impact on battery life.
The manufacturer only uses a 4-cell battery with a capacity of 60 Wh in this 4.5 />The features a bigger 96 Wh battery.
The competitors last about one hour longer.
The G501JW with bigger battery ran about 1.
The poor results are caused by the high power consumption and the smaller battery.
Although the Full HD display has a lower resolution than the QHD display in the other model, better brightness, brightness distribution and contrast are convincing.
If the 1920x1080 resolution is enough for you, you can save money and will get a display with a significantly better rating.
Regarding performance, our test model has some problems under full load.
During the stress test and some games, we saw a black screen after a short time, although the device apparently continued running in the background.
We cannot exclude that this is due to a defect in our test model.
The lack of a PCI-e SSD gets apparent in the benchmarks, but it is acceptable in practice.
It is significantly worse that the battery life is even lower than the already not particularly great US model's, since the battery is smaller.
Three hours of web surfing is too short for a mobile multimedia all-rounder in this price range.
The small G501JW is suitable for multimedia.
However, those who want to replace a genuine gamer should look elsewhere.
In principle, the Nvidia GTX 960M is a good choice for sufficiently accelerating current games.
However, the G501 falls significantly behind devices with comparable components in our gaming tests.
The compact design seems to take its toll here.